lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 16 May 2017 09:01:56 +0200
From:   Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
To:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc:     Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        "Herton R. Krzesinski" <herton@...hat.com>,
        linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
        Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...el.com>,
        Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@...marit.de>,
        Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com>,
        Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
        sayli karnik <karniksayli1995@...il.com>,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        Silvio Fricke <silvio.fricke@...il.com>,
        Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Convert more books to ReST

Hi Jonathan,

On Mon, 15 May 2017 11:15:19 -0600
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> wrote:

> On Mon, 15 May 2017 14:09:12 +0200
> Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com> wrote:
> 
> > >   mtd: adjust kernel-docs to avoid Sphinx/kerneldoc warnings    
> > 
> > Not sure how you plan to merge these changes, but if it goes through
> > a single tree I'll probably need an immutable topic branch, because I
> > plan to change a few things in nand_base.c nand.h for the next release.  
> 
> docs-next doesn't rebase, so there shouldn't be trouble there.  But we
> could also just separate this patch into two pieces.  I suspect we could
> live with a couple of warnings for a period during the 4.13 merge window
> without too much pain...

I like this idea. This way I can take the nand_base.c/nand.h changes
through my tree and let you pick the Doc migration bits.

Thanks,

Boris

Powered by blists - more mailing lists