[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170516093119.GW19912@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 10:31:19 +0100
From: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: use kvmalloc_array for drm_malloc*
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 11:06:06AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
>
> drm_malloc* has grown their own kmalloc with vmalloc fallback
> implementations. MM has grown kvmalloc* helpers in the meantime. Let's
> use those because it a) reduces the code and b) MM has a better idea
> how to implement fallbacks (e.g. do not vmalloc before kmalloc is tried
> with __GFP_NORETRY).
Better? The same idea. The only difference I was reluctant to hand out
large pages for long lived objects. If that's the wisdom of the core mm,
so be it.
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
Powered by blists - more mailing lists