[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170516110907.3545799-3-arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 13:09:04 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
arnd@...db.de
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] HID: intel_ish-hid: clarify locking in client code
I was trying to understand this code while working on a warning
fix and the locking made no sense: spin_lock_irqsave() is pointless
when run inside of an interrupt handler or nested inside of another
spin_lock_irq() or spin_lock_irqsave().
Here it turned out that the comment above the function is wrong,
as both recv_ishtp_cl_msg_dma() and recv_ishtp_cl_msg() can in fact
be called from a work queue rather than an ISR, so we do have to
use the irqsave() version once.
This fixes the comments accordingly, removes the misleading 'dev_flags'
variable and modifies the inner spinlock to not use 'irqsave'.
No functional change is intended, this is just for readability and
it slightly simplifies the object code.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
---
drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ishtp/client.c | 46 +++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ishtp/client.c b/drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ishtp/client.c
index 69c9d43612ec..a4511ac8a87f 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ishtp/client.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ishtp/client.c
@@ -803,7 +803,7 @@ void ishtp_cl_send_msg(struct ishtp_device *dev, struct ishtp_cl *cl)
* @ishtp_hdr: Pointer to message header
*
* Receive and dispatch ISHTP client messages. This function executes in ISR
- * context
+ * or work queue context
*/
void recv_ishtp_cl_msg(struct ishtp_device *dev,
struct ishtp_msg_hdr *ishtp_hdr)
@@ -813,7 +813,6 @@ void recv_ishtp_cl_msg(struct ishtp_device *dev,
struct ishtp_cl_rb *new_rb;
unsigned char *buffer = NULL;
struct ishtp_cl_rb *complete_rb = NULL;
- unsigned long dev_flags;
unsigned long flags;
int rb_count;
@@ -828,9 +827,9 @@ void recv_ishtp_cl_msg(struct ishtp_device *dev,
goto eoi;
}
- spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->read_list_spinlock, dev_flags);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->read_list_spinlock, flags);
if (list_empty(&dev->read_list.list)) {
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->read_list_spinlock, dev_flags);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->read_list_spinlock, flags);
goto eoi;
}
@@ -845,8 +844,7 @@ void recv_ishtp_cl_msg(struct ishtp_device *dev,
/* If no Rx buffer is allocated, disband the rb */
if (rb->buffer.size == 0 || rb->buffer.data == NULL) {
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->read_list_spinlock,
- dev_flags);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->read_list_spinlock, flags);
dev_err(&cl->device->dev,
"Rx buffer is not allocated.\n");
list_del(&rb->list);
@@ -862,8 +860,7 @@ void recv_ishtp_cl_msg(struct ishtp_device *dev,
* back FC, so communication will be stuck anyway)
*/
if (rb->buffer.size < ishtp_hdr->length + rb->buf_idx) {
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->read_list_spinlock,
- dev_flags);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->read_list_spinlock, flags);
dev_err(&cl->device->dev,
"message overflow. size %d len %d idx %ld\n",
rb->buffer.size, ishtp_hdr->length,
@@ -889,14 +886,13 @@ void recv_ishtp_cl_msg(struct ishtp_device *dev,
* the whole msg arrived, send a new FC, and add a new
* rb buffer for the next coming msg
*/
- spin_lock_irqsave(&cl->free_list_spinlock, flags);
+ spin_lock(&cl->free_list_spinlock);
if (!list_empty(&cl->free_rb_list.list)) {
new_rb = list_entry(cl->free_rb_list.list.next,
struct ishtp_cl_rb, list);
list_del_init(&new_rb->list);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cl->free_list_spinlock,
- flags);
+ spin_unlock(&cl->free_list_spinlock);
new_rb->cl = cl;
new_rb->buf_idx = 0;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&new_rb->list);
@@ -905,8 +901,7 @@ void recv_ishtp_cl_msg(struct ishtp_device *dev,
ishtp_hbm_cl_flow_control_req(dev, cl);
} else {
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cl->free_list_spinlock,
- flags);
+ spin_unlock(&cl->free_list_spinlock);
}
}
/* One more fragment in message (even if this was last) */
@@ -919,7 +914,7 @@ void recv_ishtp_cl_msg(struct ishtp_device *dev,
break;
}
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->read_list_spinlock, dev_flags);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->read_list_spinlock, flags);
/* If it's nobody's message, just read and discard it */
if (!buffer) {
uint8_t rd_msg_buf[ISHTP_RD_MSG_BUF_SIZE];
@@ -945,7 +940,7 @@ void recv_ishtp_cl_msg(struct ishtp_device *dev,
* @hbm: hbm buffer
*
* Receive and dispatch ISHTP client messages using DMA. This function executes
- * in ISR context
+ * in ISR or work queue context
*/
void recv_ishtp_cl_msg_dma(struct ishtp_device *dev, void *msg,
struct dma_xfer_hbm *hbm)
@@ -955,12 +950,11 @@ void recv_ishtp_cl_msg_dma(struct ishtp_device *dev, void *msg,
struct ishtp_cl_rb *new_rb;
unsigned char *buffer = NULL;
struct ishtp_cl_rb *complete_rb = NULL;
- unsigned long dev_flags;
unsigned long flags;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->read_list_spinlock, dev_flags);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->read_list_spinlock, flags);
if (list_empty(&dev->read_list.list)) {
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->read_list_spinlock, dev_flags);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->read_list_spinlock, flags);
goto eoi;
}
@@ -975,8 +969,7 @@ void recv_ishtp_cl_msg_dma(struct ishtp_device *dev, void *msg,
* If no Rx buffer is allocated, disband the rb
*/
if (rb->buffer.size == 0 || rb->buffer.data == NULL) {
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->read_list_spinlock,
- dev_flags);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->read_list_spinlock, flags);
dev_err(&cl->device->dev,
"response buffer is not allocated.\n");
list_del(&rb->list);
@@ -992,8 +985,7 @@ void recv_ishtp_cl_msg_dma(struct ishtp_device *dev, void *msg,
* back FC, so communication will be stuck anyway)
*/
if (rb->buffer.size < hbm->msg_length) {
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->read_list_spinlock,
- dev_flags);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->read_list_spinlock, flags);
dev_err(&cl->device->dev,
"message overflow. size %d len %d idx %ld\n",
rb->buffer.size, hbm->msg_length, rb->buf_idx);
@@ -1017,14 +1009,13 @@ void recv_ishtp_cl_msg_dma(struct ishtp_device *dev, void *msg,
* the whole msg arrived, send a new FC, and add a new
* rb buffer for the next coming msg
*/
- spin_lock_irqsave(&cl->free_list_spinlock, flags);
+ spin_lock(&cl->free_list_spinlock);
if (!list_empty(&cl->free_rb_list.list)) {
new_rb = list_entry(cl->free_rb_list.list.next,
struct ishtp_cl_rb, list);
list_del_init(&new_rb->list);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cl->free_list_spinlock,
- flags);
+ spin_unlock(&cl->free_list_spinlock);
new_rb->cl = cl;
new_rb->buf_idx = 0;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&new_rb->list);
@@ -1033,8 +1024,7 @@ void recv_ishtp_cl_msg_dma(struct ishtp_device *dev, void *msg,
ishtp_hbm_cl_flow_control_req(dev, cl);
} else {
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cl->free_list_spinlock,
- flags);
+ spin_unlock(&cl->free_list_spinlock);
}
/* One more fragment in message (this is always last) */
@@ -1047,7 +1037,7 @@ void recv_ishtp_cl_msg_dma(struct ishtp_device *dev, void *msg,
break;
}
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->read_list_spinlock, dev_flags);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->read_list_spinlock, flags);
/* If it's nobody's message, just read and discard it */
if (!buffer) {
dev_err(dev->devc, "Dropped Rx (DMA) msg - no request\n");
--
2.9.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists