[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170516122211.GA27959@lunn.ch>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 14:22:11 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>
Cc: adrian.hunter@...el.com, huziji@...vell.com,
ulf.hansson@...aro.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-xenon: kill xenon_clean_phy()
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 02:17:20PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> Currently, the xenon_clean_phy() is only used for freeing phy_params.
> The phy_params is allocated by devm_kzalloc(), there's no need to free
> is explicitly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-xenon-phy.c | 14 +-------------
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-xenon.c | 6 +-----
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-xenon.h | 1 -
> 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-xenon-phy.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-xenon-phy.c
> index 6356781f1cca..f7e26b031e76 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-xenon-phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-xenon-phy.c
> @@ -787,14 +787,6 @@ int xenon_phy_adj(struct sdhci_host *host, struct mmc_ios *ios)
> return ret;
> }
>
> -void xenon_clean_phy(struct sdhci_host *host)
> -{
> - struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
> - struct xenon_priv *priv = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
> -
> - kfree(priv->phy_params);
Hi Jisheng
If the memory has been allocated using the devm_ API, calling kfree
here is wrong, and can lead to a double free.
So this patch should probably have a fixes: tag. Should it also goto
stable?
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists