[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170516141846.GM4626@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 16:18:46 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, walken@...gle.com,
boqun.feng@...il.com, kirill@...temov.name,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
iamjoonsoo.kim@....com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
willy@...radead.org, npiggin@...il.com, kernel-team@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 05/15] lockdep: Implement crossrelease feature
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 02:40:44PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 12:17:47PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > My complaint is mostly about naming.. and "hist_gen_id" might be a
> > better name.
>
> Ah, I also think the name, 'work_id', is not good... and frankly I am
> not sure if 'hist_gen_id' is good, either. What about to apply 'rollback',
> which I did for locks in irq, into works of workqueues? If you say yes,
> I will try to do it.
If the rollback thing works, that's fine too. If it gets ugly, stick
with something like 'hist_id'.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists