lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170517011115.3e5e6d74a0602fcc2467c886@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 17 May 2017 01:11:15 +0900
From:   Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:     "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] ftrace/instances: Clear function triggers when
 removing instances

On Mon, 15 May 2017 12:11:03 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:

> On Mon, 15 May 2017 11:21:15 -0400
> Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, 14 May 2017 01:01:02 +0530
> > "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > If instance directories are deleted while there are registered function
> > > triggers:
> > > 
> > >   # cd /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/instances
> > >   # mkdir test
> > >   # echo "schedule:enable_event:sched:sched_switch" > test/set_ftrace_filter
> > >   # rmdir test
> > >   Unable to handle kernel paging request for data at address 0x00000008
> > >   Unable to handle kernel paging request for data at address 0x00000008
> > >   Faulting instruction address: 0xc0000000021edde8
> > >   Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1]
> > >   SMP NR_CPUS=2048
> > >   NUMA
> > >   pSeries  
> > 
> > Looks like this patch needs to be marked for stable, and go in right
> > away. I may also do the same for the ftracetest bashism patch with
> > Masami's approval. I may also slip in the ftracetest for the bug that
> > this patch fixes.
> 
> As this patch fixes a bug that was introduced with the 4.12 merge
> window. Thus, it's not stable worthy (stable isn't affected). Although,
> I'll wait on Masami to see if that should go to stable.

Hm, for the bashism fix, that is not a show-stopper... and also,
newer ftracetest should work on older kernel. So I don't think
it needs to go stable.

Thank you, 

> 
> -- Steve
> 


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ