linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 07/18] xen/pvcalls: implement socket command

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f183e016-01e3-6417-93c7-300e2aba7151@oracle.com>
Date:   Mon, 15 May 2017 22:12:33 -0400
From:   Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
To:     Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
        xen-devel@...ts.xen.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jgross@...e.com,
        Stefano Stabellini <stefano@...reto.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/18] xen/pvcalls: implement socket command



On 05/15/2017 04:35 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Just reply with success to the other end for now. Delay the allocation
> of the actual socket to bind and/or connect.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano@...reto.com>
> CC: boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com
> CC: jgross@...e.com
> ---
>  drivers/xen/pvcalls-back.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/pvcalls-back.c b/drivers/xen/pvcalls-back.c
> index 2b2a49a..2eae096 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/pvcalls-back.c
> +++ b/drivers/xen/pvcalls-back.c
> @@ -12,12 +12,17 @@
>   * GNU General Public License for more details.
>   */
>
> +#include <linux/inet.h>
>  #include <linux/kthread.h>
>  #include <linux/list.h>
>  #include <linux/radix-tree.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/rwsem.h>
>  #include <linux/wait.h>
> +#include <net/sock.h>
> +#include <net/inet_common.h>
> +#include <net/inet_connection_sock.h>
> +#include <net/request_sock.h>
>
>  #include <xen/events.h>
>  #include <xen/grant_table.h>
> @@ -65,7 +70,31 @@ static void pvcalls_back_ioworker(struct work_struct *work)
>  static int pvcalls_back_socket(struct xenbus_device *dev,
>  		struct xen_pvcalls_request *req)
>  {
> -	return 0;
> +	struct pvcalls_back_priv *priv;
> +	int ret;
> +	struct xen_pvcalls_response *rsp;
> +
> +	if (dev == NULL)
> +		return 0;
> +	priv = dev_get_drvdata(&dev->dev);

This is inconsistent with pvcalls_back_event() tests, where you check 
both for NULL. OTOH, I am not sure a check is needed at all since you've 
just tested these in pvcalls_back_event().


-boris

> +
> +	if (req->u.socket.domain != AF_INET ||
> +	    req->u.socket.type != SOCK_STREAM ||
> +	    (req->u.socket.protocol != 0 &&
> +	     req->u.socket.protocol != AF_INET))
> +		ret = -EAFNOSUPPORT;
> +	else
> +		ret = 0;
> +
> +	/* leave the actual socket allocation for later */
> +
> +	rsp = RING_GET_RESPONSE(&priv->ring, priv->ring.rsp_prod_pvt++);
> +	rsp->req_id = req->req_id;
> +	rsp->cmd = req->cmd;
> +	rsp->u.socket.id = req->u.socket.id;
> +	rsp->ret = ret;
> +
> +	return 1;
>  }
>
>  static int pvcalls_back_connect(struct xenbus_device *dev,
>