linux-kernel - arm64 vs arm tree for BCM2837 DT pull requests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87tw4kbgqh.fsf@eliezer.anholt.net>
Date:   Tue, 16 May 2017 15:04:54 -0700
From:   Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>
To:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
        Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:     linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: arm64 vs arm tree for BCM2837 DT pull requests

I'm looking for feedback on how the ARM folks would like to see pull
requests for Raspberry Pi 3 devicetree changes.  My problem is trying to
merge patches like:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9603689/

which depends on:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9619573/

bcm2837's DT is in arm64/, but includes the bcm283x.dtsi under arm/
(which also contains pi0-2), so we often end up with cross-tree
dependencies when trying to merge a patch series affecting peripherals
common to all of them.  How I've done this in the past is in
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-rpi-kernel/2016-November/004804.html:
Send a PR for bcm2835-dt-next for the arm/ BCM283x changes, merge that
tag to bcm2835-dt-64-next, apply the arm64 change, and send a separate
PR for that branch.

This seems silly to me -- in trying to keep a small arm64/ change out of
the branch for arm/, we end up pulling in much larger arm/ changes to
the arm64/ branch.  Also, this process doesn't work if we need to make a
single-commit change across both (like if we decided to change a node
name that's referenced by '&' in the board-specific .dts files).

So, I'd like to ask that I be able to merge all the BCM283x DT changes
through my bcm2835-dt-next branch, if that's OK.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (833 bytes)