[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <14580dfc-9721-38ab-a1e0-6b4aba13b406@suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 10:01:29 +0200
From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>,
Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Richard Kuo <rkuo@...eaurora.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>,
Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@...nalahti.fi>,
Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...isc-linux.org>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>,
Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-hexagon@...r.kernel.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, openrisc@...ts.librecores.org,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] futex: remove duplicated code
On 05/15/2017, 03:16 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> Whilst I think this is a good idea, the code in question actually results
> in undefined behaviour per the C spec and is reported by UBSAN.
Hi, yes, I know -- this patch was the 1st from the series of 3 which I
sent a long time ago to fix that up too. But I remember your patch, so I
sent only this one this time.
> See my
> patch fixing arm64 here (which I'd forgotten about):
>
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-arch/msg38564.html
>
> But, as stated in the thread above, I think we should go a step further
> and remove FUTEX_OP_{OR,ANDN,XOR,OPARG_SHIFT} altogether. They don't
> appear to be used by userspace, and this whole thing is a total mess.
>
> Any thoughts?
Ok, I am all for that. I think the only question is who is going to do
the work and submit it :)? Do I understand correctly to eliminate all
these functions and the path into the kernel? But won't this break API
-- are there really no users of this interface?
thanks,
--
js
suse labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists