| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20170517103602.GD14654@leverpostej>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 11:36:02 +0100
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@...com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Carlo Caione <carlo@...one.org>,
Richard Cochran <rcochran@...utronix.de>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.com>,
"moderated list:ARM PORT" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:SYNOPSYS ARC ARCH..." <linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:ARM/STI ARCHITECTURE" <kernel@...inux.com>,
"moderated list:ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNO..."
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V10 1/3] irq: Allow to pass the IRQF_TIMER flag with
percpu irq request
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 09:44:32PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> In the next changes, we track when the interrupts occur in order to
> statistically compute when is supposed to happen the next interrupt.
>
> In all the interruptions, it does not make sense to store the timer interrupt
> occurences and try to predict the next interrupt as when know the expiration
> time.
>
> The request_irq() has a irq flags parameter and the timer drivers use it to
> pass the IRQF_TIMER flag, letting us know the interrupt is coming from a timer.
> Based on this flag, we can discard these interrupts when tracking them.
>
> But, the API request_percpu_irq does not allow to pass a flag, hence specifying
> if the interrupt type is a timer.
>
> Add a function request_percpu_irq_flags() where we can specify the flags. The
> request_percpu_irq() function is changed to be a wrapper to
> request_percpu_irq_flags() passing a zero flag parameter.
>
> Change the timers using request_percpu_irq() to use request_percpu_irq_flags()
> instead with the IRQF_TIMER flag set.
>
> For now, in order to prevent a misusage of this parameter, only the IRQF_TIMER
> flag (or zero) is a valid parameter to be passed to the
> request_percpu_irq_flags() function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
> Cc: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@...com>
> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>
> Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
> Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
> Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
> ---
> Changelog:
>
> V10:
> - Drop the change for arch arm virtual timer
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/4/25/184
> V9:
> - Clarified the patch description
> - Fixed EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(request_percpu_irq_flags)
> ---
> arch/arm/kernel/smp_twd.c | 3 ++-
> drivers/clocksource/arc_timer.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
> drivers/clocksource/arm_global_timer.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c | 7 ++++---
> drivers/clocksource/qcom-timer.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/clocksource/time-armada-370-xp.c | 9 +++++----
> drivers/clocksource/timer-nps.c | 6 +++---
> include/linux/interrupt.h | 11 ++++++++++-
> kernel/irq/manage.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
> 10 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
As an aside, perhaps it would make more sense to move the
request_percpu_irq_flags() addition into a preparatory patch? That way
it's clearly separated from the mechanical clocksource changes, and it's
easy to see how it works.
Either way, for arm_arch_timer:
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Thanks,
Mark.
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> index 4bed671..22646b5 100644
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> @@ -980,25 +980,29 @@ static int __init arch_timer_register(void)
> ppi = arch_timer_ppi[arch_timer_uses_ppi];
> switch (arch_timer_uses_ppi) {
> case ARCH_TIMER_VIRT_PPI:
> - err = request_percpu_irq(ppi, arch_timer_handler_virt,
> - "arch_timer", arch_timer_evt);
> + err = request_percpu_irq_flags(ppi, arch_timer_handler_virt,
> + IRQF_TIMER, "arch_timer",
> + arch_timer_evt);
> break;
> case ARCH_TIMER_PHYS_SECURE_PPI:
> case ARCH_TIMER_PHYS_NONSECURE_PPI:
> - err = request_percpu_irq(ppi, arch_timer_handler_phys,
> - "arch_timer", arch_timer_evt);
> + err = request_percpu_irq_flags(ppi, arch_timer_handler_phys,
> + IRQF_TIMER, "arch_timer",
> + arch_timer_evt);
> if (!err && arch_timer_has_nonsecure_ppi()) {
> ppi = arch_timer_ppi[ARCH_TIMER_PHYS_NONSECURE_PPI];
> - err = request_percpu_irq(ppi, arch_timer_handler_phys,
> - "arch_timer", arch_timer_evt);
> + err = request_percpu_irq_flags(ppi, arch_timer_handler_phys,
> + IRQF_TIMER, "arch_timer",
> + arch_timer_evt);
> if (err)
> free_percpu_irq(arch_timer_ppi[ARCH_TIMER_PHYS_SECURE_PPI],
> arch_timer_evt);
> }
> break;
> case ARCH_TIMER_HYP_PPI:
> - err = request_percpu_irq(ppi, arch_timer_handler_phys,
> - "arch_timer", arch_timer_evt);
> + err = request_percpu_irq_flags(ppi, arch_timer_handler_phys,
> + IRQF_TIMER, "arch_timer",
> + arch_timer_evt);
> break;
> default:
> BUG();
Powered by blists - more mailing lists