linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] mtd: mchp23k256: device tree and mchp23lcv1024

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170517114128.GA19968@lunn.ch>
Date:   Wed, 17 May 2017 13:41:28 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
Cc:     dwmw2@...radead.org, computersforpeace@...il.com,
        linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] mtd: mchp23k256: device tree and mchp23lcv1024

On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 05:39:04PM +1200, Chris Packham wrote:
> This series adds device tree support to the mchp23k256 driver and
> support for the mchp23lcv1024 chip. I suspect there are more compatible
> variants that we could now enumerate if desired.

Hi Chris

Cool. I only have a mchp23k256, so that is what i targeted. And it is
used on an Intel board, via a USB-SPI dongle, so i didn't need
platform data. I considered partition support, but decided against it,
for my use case. I can just about get a usable minix filesystem in
256K. But anything smaller seems silly to have a real filesystem on
it.

	Andrew