linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 09/22] scsi: hisi_sas: retrieve SAS address for pci-based controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK8P3a0RxVq6Y0OpQWikDKBSvu0z42TCAEVRmrFD0CJwmh3SXw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 17 May 2017 14:37:52 +0200
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
Cc:     "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        John Garry <john.garry2@...l.dcu.ie>, linuxarm@...wei.com,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/22] scsi: hisi_sas: retrieve SAS address for pci-based controller

On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 12:49 PM, John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com> wrote:
> For a pci-based controller, retrieve the SAS address from the
> ACPI tables.
>
> The retrieval is based on the ACPI device node name. Sample is
> as follows:
> Scope(_SB)
> {
>     Device(SAS0) {
>                 Name(_HID, "HISI0163")
>                 Name (_DSD, Package () {
>               ToUUID("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"),
>               Package () {
>                                 Package (2) {"sas-addr", Package() {0x50, 0x01, 0x88, 0x20, 0x16, 00, 00, 0x00}},
>               }
>           })
>         }
> }
>
> If the ACPI node or node property is not available, then we fall
> back on a default address.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>

Since this uses the _DSD information that was introduced for compatibility
between device tree and ACPI based data, why not write the code so that
it can work for both?

Ideally this should just look up the property for pci_dev->fwnode, but I'm
not entirely sure if this works the same way on ACPI and DT today.

         Arnd