lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 17 May 2017 14:37:23 +0100
From:   John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC:     "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        John Garry <john.garry2@...l.dcu.ie>, <linuxarm@...wei.com>,
        <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/22] scsi: hisi_sas: retrieve SAS address for pci-based
 controller

On 17/05/2017 13:37, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 12:49 PM, John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com> wrote:
>> > For a pci-based controller, retrieve the SAS address from the
>> > ACPI tables.
>> >
>> > The retrieval is based on the ACPI device node name. Sample is
>> > as follows:
>> > Scope(_SB)
>> > {
>> >     Device(SAS0) {
>> >                 Name(_HID, "HISI0163")
>> >                 Name (_DSD, Package () {
>> >               ToUUID("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"),
>> >               Package () {
>> >                                 Package (2) {"sas-addr", Package() {0x50, 0x01, 0x88, 0x20, 0x16, 00, 00, 0x00}},
>> >               }
>> >           })
>> >         }
>> > }
>> >
>> > If the ACPI node or node property is not available, then we fall
>> > back on a default address.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
> Since this uses the _DSD information that was introduced for compatibility
> between device tree and ACPI based data, why not write the code so that
> it can work for both?
>
> Ideally this should just look up the property for pci_dev->fwnode, but I'm
> not entirely sure if this works the same way on ACPI and DT today.
>

Hi Arnd,

There is no relation at all between the pci device and the ACPI DSDT, 
apart from the fact that the device node name is known by the driver, 
that being "SAS0". I am not 100% comfortable with this, as we are 
introducing some sort of device indexing in the driver.

Please note that Cavium did something similar on their thunderx network 
driver:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/thunder/thunder_bgx.c?h=v4.12-rc1#n1162

As for your suggestion, in theory it could be ok to have a 
pci_dev->fwnode, and this would work for Unified Device Properties 
Interface (if that is indeed what you mean). But how to create/match 
this fwnode?

Thanks,
John

>          Arnd


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ