lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 17 May 2017 19:36:46 +0200
From:   Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     fweimer@...hat.com, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: commit cfafcd117 "futex: Rework futex_lock_pi() to use
 rt_mutex_*_proxy_lock()" causes glibc nptl/tst-robustpi8 failure

Since:
commit cfafcd117da0216520568c195cb2f6cd1980c4bb
Author: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Date:   Wed Mar 22 11:35:58 2017 +0100

    futex: Rework futex_lock_pi() to use rt_mutex_*_proxy_lock()

glibc's nptl/tst-robustpi8 testcase fails:

glibc-build % ./nptl/tst-robustpi8
tst-robustpi8: ../nptl/pthread_mutex_lock.c:424: __pthread_mutex_lock_full: Assertion `INTERNAL_SYSCALL_ERRNO (e, __err) != ESRCH || !robust' failed.

pthread_mutex_lock.c:
415             if (INTERNAL_SYSCALL_ERROR_P (e, __err)
416                 && (INTERNAL_SYSCALL_ERRNO (e, __err) == ESRCH
417                     || INTERNAL_SYSCALL_ERRNO (e, __err) == EDEADLK))
418               {
419                 assert (INTERNAL_SYSCALL_ERRNO (e, __err) != EDEADLK
420                         || (kind != PTHREAD_MUTEX_ERRORCHECK_NP
421                             && kind != PTHREAD_MUTEX_RECURSIVE_NP));
422                 /* ESRCH can happen only for non-robust PI mutexes where
423                    the owner of the lock died.  */
424                 assert (INTERNAL_SYSCALL_ERRNO (e, __err) != ESRCH || !robust);

During bisection the commit above hangs the machine when I run the
testcase.

See: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21487

--
Markus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ