linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm64: cpufeature: check translation granule size based on kernel config

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170518151329.GF21359@arm.com>
Date:   Thu, 18 May 2017 16:13:30 +0100
From:   Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc:     Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@....com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
        James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Guodong Xu <guodong.xu@...aro.org>,
        Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...aro.org>,
        Douglas Raillard <douglas.raillard@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: cpufeature: check translation granule size based
 on kernel config

On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 03:24:15PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 09:02:50PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
> > On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 01:41:15PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> > > index 94b8f7f..1f53314 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> > > @@ -639,8 +639,8 @@ void update_cpu_features(int cpu,
> > >          * Mismatched CPU features are a recipe for disaster. Don't even
> > >          * pretend to support them.
> > >          */
> > > -       WARN_TAINT_ONCE(taint, TAINT_CPU_OUT_OF_SPEC,
> > > -                       "Unsupported CPU feature variation.\n");
> > > +       pr_warn_once("Unsupported CPU feature variation detected.\n");
> > > +       add_taint(TAINT_CPU_OUT_OF_SPEC);
> > 
> > Should be add_taint(TAINT_CPU_OUT_OF_SPEC, LOCKDEP_STILL_OK)?
> 
> Whoops; yes.

I've picked this up with the fix above.

Will