| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 15:43:40 +0000
From: "He, Min" <min.he@...el.com>
To: "Chen, Xiaoguang" <xiaoguang.chen@...el.com>,
"alex.williamson@...hat.com" <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
"kraxel@...hat.com" <kraxel@...hat.com>,
"intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org" <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com" <zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com>,
"Lv, Zhiyuan" <zhiyuan.lv@...el.com>,
"intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"Wang, Zhi A" <zhi.a.wang@...el.com>,
"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>
CC: "Niu, Bing" <bing.niu@...el.com>,
"Chen, Xiaoguang" <xiaoguang.chen@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 2/5] drm/i915/gvt: OpRegion support for GVT-g
Xiaoguang,
I have some comments inline. Thanks.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: intel-gvt-dev [mailto:intel-gvt-dev-bounces@...ts.freedesktop.org] On
> Behalf Of Xiaoguang Chen
> Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2017 2:50 AM
> To: alex.williamson@...hat.com; kraxel@...hat.com; intel-
> gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com; Lv, Zhiyuan <zhiyuan.lv@...el.com>; intel-gvt-
> dev@...ts.freedesktop.org; Wang, Zhi A <zhi.a.wang@...el.com>; Tian, Kevin
> <kevin.tian@...el.com>
> Cc: Niu, Bing <bing.niu@...el.com>; Chen, Xiaoguang
> <xiaoguang.chen@...el.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v2 2/5] drm/i915/gvt: OpRegion support for GVT-g
>
> OpRegion is needed to support display related operation for
> intel vgpu.
>
> A vfio device region is added to intel vgpu to deliver the
> host OpRegion information to user space so user space can
> construct the OpRegion for vgpu.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bing Niu <bing.niu@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Xiaoguang Chen <xiaoguang.chen@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c | 97
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/opregion.c | 12 ++++-
> 2 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
> index 3c6a02b..389f072 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
> @@ -53,6 +53,8 @@
> #define VFIO_PCI_INDEX_TO_OFFSET(index) ((u64)(index) <<
> VFIO_PCI_OFFSET_SHIFT)
> #define VFIO_PCI_OFFSET_MASK (((u64)(1) << VFIO_PCI_OFFSET_SHIFT) - 1)
>
> +#define OPREGION_SIGNATURE "IntelGraphicsMem"
> +
> struct vfio_region;
> struct intel_vgpu_regops {
> size_t (*rw)(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu, char *buf,
> @@ -436,6 +438,92 @@ static void kvmgt_protect_table_del(struct
> kvmgt_guest_info *info,
> }
> }
>
> +static size_t intel_vgpu_reg_rw_opregion(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu, char *buf,
> + size_t count, loff_t *ppos, bool iswrite)
> +{
> + unsigned int i = VFIO_PCI_OFFSET_TO_INDEX(*ppos) -
> + VFIO_PCI_NUM_REGIONS;
> + void *base = vgpu->vdev.region[i].data;
> + loff_t pos = *ppos & VFIO_PCI_OFFSET_MASK;
> +
> + if (pos >= vgpu->vdev.region[i].size || iswrite) {
> + gvt_vgpu_err("invalid op or offset for Intel vgpu OpRegion\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + count = min(count, (size_t)(vgpu->vdev.region[i].size - pos));
> + memcpy(buf, base + pos, count);
> +
> + return count;
> +}
> +
> +static void intel_vgpu_reg_release_opregion(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu,
> + struct vfio_region *region)
> +{
> + memunmap(region->data);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct intel_vgpu_regops intel_vgpu_regops_opregion = {
> + .rw = intel_vgpu_reg_rw_opregion,
> + .release = intel_vgpu_reg_release_opregion,
> +};
> +
> +static int intel_vgpu_register_reg(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu,
> + unsigned int type, unsigned int subtype,
> + const struct intel_vgpu_regops *ops,
> + size_t size, u32 flags, void *data)
> +{
> + struct vfio_region *region;
> +
> + region = krealloc(vgpu->vdev.region,
> + (vgpu->vdev.num_regions + 1) * sizeof(*region),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!region)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + vgpu->vdev.region = region;
> + vgpu->vdev.region[vgpu->vdev.num_regions].type = type;
> + vgpu->vdev.region[vgpu->vdev.num_regions].subtype = subtype;
> + vgpu->vdev.region[vgpu->vdev.num_regions].ops = ops;
> + vgpu->vdev.region[vgpu->vdev.num_regions].size = size;
> + vgpu->vdev.region[vgpu->vdev.num_regions].flags = flags;
> + vgpu->vdev.region[vgpu->vdev.num_regions].data = data;
> + vgpu->vdev.num_regions++;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int intel_vgpu_reg_init_opregion(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu)
> +{
> + unsigned int addr;
> + void *base;
> + int ret;
> +
> + addr = vgpu->gvt->opregion.opregion_pa;
> + if (!addr || !(~addr))
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + base = memremap(addr, OPREGION_SIZE, MEMREMAP_WB);
> + if (!base)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + if (memcmp(base, OPREGION_SIGNATURE, 16)) {
> + memunmap(base);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + ret = intel_vgpu_register_reg(vgpu,
> + PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL |
> VFIO_REGION_TYPE_PCI_VENDOR_TYPE,
> + VFIO_REGION_SUBTYPE_INTEL_IGD_OPREGION,
> + &intel_vgpu_regops_opregion, OPREGION_SIZE,
> + VFIO_REGION_INFO_FLAG_READ, base);
In current GVT code, we already have a function init_vgpu_opregion,
which will copy the physical opregion into a per vgpu structure:
vgpu_opregion(vgpu)->va, why don’t you reuse this function and set the
vgpu_opregion(vgpu)->va to the intel_vgpu_register_reg function?
> + if (ret) {
> + memunmap(base);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> static int intel_vgpu_create(struct kobject *kobj, struct mdev_device *mdev)
> {
> struct intel_vgpu *vgpu = NULL;
> @@ -467,6 +555,15 @@ static int intel_vgpu_create(struct kobject *kobj, struct
> mdev_device *mdev)
> vgpu->vdev.mdev = mdev;
> mdev_set_drvdata(mdev, vgpu);
>
> + ret = intel_vgpu_reg_init_opregion(vgpu);
> + if (ret) {
> + gvt_vgpu_err("create OpRegion failed\n");
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + gvt_dbg_core("create OpRegion succeeded for mdev:%s\n",
> + dev_name(mdev_dev(mdev)));
> +
> gvt_dbg_core("intel_vgpu_create succeeded for mdev: %s\n",
> dev_name(mdev_dev(mdev)));
> ret = 0;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/opregion.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/opregion.c
> index 3117991..99591bc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/opregion.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/opregion.c
> @@ -283,14 +283,22 @@ int intel_vgpu_emulate_opregion_request(struct
> intel_vgpu *vgpu, u32 swsci)
> {
> u32 *scic, *parm;
> u32 func, subfunc;
> + u32 scic_val, parm_val;
> + u32 gpa;
>
> - scic = vgpu_opregion(vgpu)->va + INTEL_GVT_OPREGION_SCIC;
> - parm = vgpu_opregion(vgpu)->va + INTEL_GVT_OPREGION_PARM;
> + memcpy(&gpa, vgpu_cfg_space(vgpu) + INTEL_GVT_PCI_OPREGION,
> + sizeof(gpa));
> + intel_gvt_hypervisor_read_gpa(vgpu, gpa +
> INTEL_GVT_OPREGION_SCIC,
> + &scic_val, sizeof(scic_val));
> + intel_gvt_hypervisor_read_gpa(vgpu, gpa +
> INTEL_GVT_OPREGION_PARM,
> + &parm_val, sizeof(parm_val));
As I said, you can call init_vgpu_opregion(), then vgpu_opregion(vgpu)->va will
be valid and you don’t need to change here.
>
> if (!(swsci & SWSCI_SCI_SELECT)) {
> gvt_vgpu_err("requesting SMI service\n");
> return 0;
> }
> + scic = &scic_val;
> + parm = &parm_val;
> /* ignore non 0->1 trasitions */
> if ((vgpu_cfg_space(vgpu)[INTEL_GVT_PCI_SWSCI]
> & SWSCI_SCI_TRIGGER) ||
> --
> 1.9.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> intel-gvt-dev mailing list
> intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gvt-dev
Powered by blists - more mailing lists