[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170518161332.GE17926@krava>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 18:13:32 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: David Carrillo-Cisneros <davidcc@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, Simon Que <sque@...omium.org>,
Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
He Kuang <hekuang@...wei.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] perf header: use struct feat_fd for process and read
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 09:16:00PM -0700, David Carrillo-Cisneros wrote:
> As preparation for using header records in pipe mode, replace
> int fd with struct feat_fd fd in process and read functions for
> all header record types.
>
> To reduce the boiler plate, define and use the FEAT_PROCESS_STR_FUN
> macro for the common case of header records that are a simple string.
please separate those changes, AFAICS it's following:
- using feat_fd in read functions
- reworking do_read_string function
- replacing readn with new do_read* functions
- adding FEAT_PROCESS_STR_FUN
thanks,
jirka
Powered by blists - more mailing lists