linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] scsi: zero per-cmd driver data for each MQ I/O

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <MWHPR03MB3136E4C180B10B99492272D4CEE40@MWHPR03MB3136.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Thu, 18 May 2017 16:47:00 +0000
From:   Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>
To:     Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@...disk.com>,
        "hch@...radead.org" <hch@...radead.org>
CC:     "jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Stephen Hemminger" <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
        KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
        "martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] scsi: zero per-cmd driver data for each MQ I/O



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bart Van Assche [mailto:Bart.VanAssche@...disk.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2017 8:52 AM
> To: hch@...radead.org
> Cc: jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com; linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org; Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>; KY
> Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>; Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>;
> martin.petersen@...cle.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: zero per-cmd driver data for each MQ I/O
> 
> On Wed, 2017-05-17 at 23:54 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 11:05:18PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > > Thank you for the feedback. I'm working on a patch series that
> > > merges the scsi-sq and scsi-mq code paths for command initialization
> > > and that should fix the bug you encountered.
> >
> > While that sounds great (I tried it a while ago but gave up due to
> > priorities) I think we should merge this patch as-is and backport it
> > to stable for now and rebase your series on top of it.
> 
> Hello Christoph,
> 
> I will rebase my patch series on top of Long Li's patch. Long, please repost your
> patch with a more detailed description and with the Reviewed-by and Cc:
> stable tags added.

Will do that.

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bart.