linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/17] convert/reorganize Documentation/security/

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGXu5jKU8fgviKUTd8B_svviuFAk7wdB=aoaFOQNe9FT_XZVEw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 18 May 2017 10:01:46 -0700
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc:     John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>,
        Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
        Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
        James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>,
        Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@...onical.com>,
        David Safford <safford@...ibm.com>,
        "linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-security-module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/17] convert/reorganize Documentation/security/

On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 9:49 AM, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> wrote:
> On Sat, 13 May 2017 04:51:36 -0700
> Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
>
>> This ReSTifies everything under Documentation/security/, and reorganizes
>> some of it (mainly the LSMs) under /admin-guide/ per Jon's request. Since
>> /security/ is already being indexed under the kernel development portion
>> of the sphinx index, I didn't move it, keeping only things that were
>> directly related to internal kernel development (keys, creds, etc).
>>
>> I also updated some path references, and MAINTAINERS lines. Some of the
>> conversion could probably do with some tweaks, but I think this is a
>> good first step in the right direction.
>
> I agree with the need for tweaks :)  I fixed up key-request.rst a bit
> since I just couldn't stand it.
>
> Anyway, the set is applied, many thanks for doing this!

Awesome, thanks for the fixes!

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security