[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALcN6mgY6xBN0un3Dn4+p5Nv6CWkfCe_RD-sc04HZS6+TZ0m1A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 11:02:31 -0700
From: David Carrillo-Cisneros <davidcc@...gle.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, Simon Que <sque@...omium.org>,
Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
He Kuang <hekuang@...wei.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] perf header: use struct feat_fd for write
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 9:13 AM, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 09:15:58PM -0700, David Carrillo-Cisneros wrote:
>> As preparation for using header records in pipe mode, replace
>> int fd with struct feat_fd fd in write functions for all header
>> record types.
>>
>> Record types that are not used in pipe-mode (such as auxtrace) will
>> never be called with fd->buf set and fail if so.
>
> please separate the struct feat_fd addition and
> the fd->buf support
Will do.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists