[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1495135946-27290-2-git-send-email-jhugo@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 13:32:25 -0600
From: Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@...eaurora.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Austin Christ <austinwc@...eaurora.org>,
Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@...eaurora.org>,
Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>,
Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@...eaurora.org>
Subject: [PATCH] sched/fair: Fix load_balance() affinity redo path
If load_balance() fails to migrate any tasks because all tasks were
affined, load_balance() removes the source cpu from consideration and
attempts to redo and balance among the new subset of cpus.
There is a bug in this code path where the algorithm considers all active
cpus in the system (minus the source that was just masked out). This is
not valid for two reasons: some active cpus may not be in the current
scheduling domain and one of the active cpus is dst_cpu. These cpus should
not be considered, as we cannot pull load from them.
Instead of failing out of load_balance(), we may end up redoing the search
with no valid cpus and incorrectly concluding the domain is balanced.
Additionally, if the group_imbalance flag was just set, it may also be
incorrectly unset, thus the flag will not be seen by other cpus in future
load_balance() runs as that algorithm intends.
Fix the check by removing cpus not in the current domain and the dst_cpu
from considertation, thus limiting the evaluation to valid remaining cpus
from which load might be migrated.
Co-authored-by: Austin Christ <austinwc@...eaurora.org>
Co-authored-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
Signed-off-by: Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@...eaurora.org>
Tested-by: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@...eaurora.org>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index d711093..a5d41b1 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -8220,7 +8220,24 @@ static int load_balance(int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq,
/* All tasks on this runqueue were pinned by CPU affinity */
if (unlikely(env.flags & LBF_ALL_PINNED)) {
cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu_of(busiest), cpus);
- if (!cpumask_empty(cpus)) {
+ /*
+ * dst_cpu is not a valid busiest cpu in the following
+ * check since load cannot be pulled from dst_cpu to be
+ * put on dst_cpu.
+ */
+ cpumask_clear_cpu(env.dst_cpu, cpus);
+ /*
+ * Go back to "redo" iff the load-balance cpumask
+ * contains other potential busiest cpus for the
+ * current sched domain.
+ */
+ if (cpumask_intersects(cpus, sched_domain_span(env.sd))) {
+ /*
+ * Now that the check has passed, reenable
+ * dst_cpu so that load can be calculated on
+ * it in the redo path.
+ */
+ cpumask_set_cpu(env.dst_cpu, cpus);
env.loop = 0;
env.loop_break = sched_nr_migrate_break;
goto redo;
--
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists