lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2176198.pfBDoCjSEJ@agathebauer>
Date:   Thu, 18 May 2017 22:05:36 +0200
From:   Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@...b.com>
To:     Linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] generate full callchain cursor entries for inlined frames

On Donnerstag, 18. Mai 2017 21:34:04 CEST Milian Wolff wrote:
> This series of patches completely reworks the way inline frames are handled.
> Instead of querying for the inline nodes on-demand in the individual tools,
> we now create proper callchain nodes for inlined frames. The advantages
> this approach brings are numerous:
> 
> - less duplicated code in the individual browser
> - aggregated cost for inlined frames for the --children top-down list
> - various bug fixes that arose from querying for a srcline/symbol based on
>   the IP of a sample, which will always point to the last inlined frame
>   instead of the corresponding non-inlined frame
> - overall much better support for visualizing cost for heavily-inlined C++
>   code, which simply was confusing and unreliably before
> - srcline honors the global setting as to whether full paths or basenames
>   should be shown
> 
> For comparison, below lists the output before and after for `perf script`
> and `perf report`. The example file I used to generate the perf data is:

And of course shortly after sending this patch series I notice the first 
issues ;-) The new behavior shows confusing results for `-g function` because 
match_chain uses sym->start. I fixed this locally to compare the actual 
function name if either of the two symbols is an inlined fake symbol:

https://github.com/milianw/linux/commit/
a1fa4486c19976f36d6ee7df263676e888c2bdb9

Before resending this whole series, it would be great if people could review 
the stuff in here such that I know whether I'm on the right track.

You can checkout my clone from github for quick testing:

https://github.com/milianw/linux/commits/wip/distinguish-inliners

Thanks

-- 
Milian Wolff | milian.wolff@...b.com | Software Engineer
KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH&Co KG, a KDAB Group company
Tel: +49-30-521325470
KDAB - The Qt Experts
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/pkcs7-signature" (5903 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ