[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNAREFfHSZ_SY=98Sg6okt4zwyZqqEuY3LEDLiA9+o34vvQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 13:35:23 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>
Cc: masahiroy@...nel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 15/29] drm/vc4: fix include notation and remove
-Iinclude/drm flag
Hi Daniel,
2017-05-17 21:40 GMT+09:00 Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>:
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 01:50:33PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>> Include <drm/*.h> instead of relative path from include/drm, then
>> remove the -Iinclude/drm compiler flag.
>>
>> While we are here, use <...> instead of "..." for include/linux/*.h
>> headers too.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
>
> This one doesn't apply anymore cleanly. Can you pls rebase onto latest
> linux-next? I'm going through the remaining patches, up to this all merged
> to drm-misc-next.
>
> Thanks, Daniel
I rebased this one as you suggested
and send v3 for the rest of the series.
Please note I am also adding
12/16 : drm/stm: remove unneeded -Iinclude/drm compiler flag
because a new user of -Iinclude/drm has appeared.
Thanks!
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
Powered by blists - more mailing lists