[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANRm+CzLBNNrhcb1ssQgZze30sEPG56HPXZBrirnODsms2GjUg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 05:53:00 +0800
From: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] KVM: x86: Fix potential preemption when get the
current kvmclock timestamp
Ping,
2017-05-12 15:44 GMT+08:00 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>:
>
>
> On 12/05/2017 03:12, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>> From: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>
>>
>> BUG: using __this_cpu_read() in preemptible [00000000] code: qemu-system-x86/2809
>> caller is __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x13/0x20
>> CPU: 2 PID: 2809 Comm: qemu-system-x86 Not tainted 4.11.0+ #13
>> Call Trace:
>> dump_stack+0x99/0xce
>> check_preemption_disabled+0xf5/0x100
>> __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x13/0x20
>> get_kvmclock_ns+0x6f/0x110 [kvm]
>> get_time_ref_counter+0x5d/0x80 [kvm]
>> kvm_hv_process_stimers+0x2a1/0x8a0 [kvm]
>> ? kvm_hv_process_stimers+0x2a1/0x8a0 [kvm]
>> ? kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0xac9/0x1ce0 [kvm]
>> kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x5bf/0x1ce0 [kvm]
>> kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x384/0x7b0 [kvm]
>> ? kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x384/0x7b0 [kvm]
>> ? __fget+0xf3/0x210
>> do_vfs_ioctl+0xa4/0x700
>> ? __fget+0x114/0x210
>> SyS_ioctl+0x79/0x90
>> entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x23/0xc2
>> RIP: 0033:0x7f9d164ed357
>> ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x13/0x20
>>
>> This can be reproduced by run kvm-unit-tests/hyperv_stimer.flat w/
>> CONFIG_PREEMPT and CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT enabled.
>>
>> Safe access to per-CPU data requires a couple of constraints, though: the
>> thread working with the data cannot be preempted and it cannot be migrated
>> while it manipulates per-CPU variables. If the thread is preempted, the
>> thread that replaces it could try to work with the same variables; migration
>> to another CPU could also cause confusion. However there is no preemption
>> disable when reads host per-CPU tsc rate to calculate the current kvmclock
>> timestamp.
>>
>> This patch fixes it by utilizing get_cpu/put_cpu pair to guarantee both
>> __this_cpu_read() and rdtsc() are not preempted.
>>
>> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
>> Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>
>> ---
>> v2 -> v3:
>> * update patch description
>> v1 -> v2:
>> * utilize get_cpu/put_cpu pair to protect both __this_cpu_read and rdtsc()
>>
>> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 10 +++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> index b54125b..3b5fc7e 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> @@ -1763,6 +1763,7 @@ u64 get_kvmclock_ns(struct kvm *kvm)
>> {
>> struct kvm_arch *ka = &kvm->arch;
>> struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info hv_clock;
>> + u64 ret;
>>
>> spin_lock(&ka->pvclock_gtod_sync_lock);
>> if (!ka->use_master_clock) {
>> @@ -1774,10 +1775,17 @@ u64 get_kvmclock_ns(struct kvm *kvm)
>> hv_clock.system_time = ka->master_kernel_ns + ka->kvmclock_offset;
>> spin_unlock(&ka->pvclock_gtod_sync_lock);
>>
>> + /* both __this_cpu_read() and rdtsc() should be on the same cpu */
>> + get_cpu();
>> +
>> kvm_get_time_scale(NSEC_PER_SEC, __this_cpu_read(cpu_tsc_khz) * 1000LL,
>> &hv_clock.tsc_shift,
>> &hv_clock.tsc_to_system_mul);
>> - return __pvclock_read_cycles(&hv_clock, rdtsc());
>> + ret = __pvclock_read_cycles(&hv_clock, rdtsc());
>> +
>> + put_cpu();
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> }
>>
>> static void kvm_setup_pvclock_page(struct kvm_vcpu *v)
>>
>
> Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Powered by blists - more mailing lists