[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170518001925.113621-1-davidcc@google.com>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 17:19:25 -0700
From: David Carrillo-Cisneros <davidcc@...gle.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
David Carrillo-Cisneros <davidcc@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH] perf annotate: process tracing data in pipe mode
perf annotate was missing the handler for tracing data records.
Prior to this patch we obtained "unhandled" records when piping
trace events to perf annotate (using -D option to show the
dump_printf messages in process_event_synth_tracing_data_stub):
$ perf record -o - -e block:bio_free sleep 2 | perf annotate -D --stdio
...
0x78 [0xc]: PERF_RECORD_TRACING_DATA: unhandled!
...
Signed-off-by: David Carrillo-Cisneros <davidcc@...gle.com>
---
tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c b/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c
index 7a5dc7e5c577..ce44edc30c71 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c
@@ -397,6 +397,7 @@ int cmd_annotate(int argc, const char **argv)
.namespaces = perf_event__process_namespaces,
.attr = perf_event__process_attr,
.build_id = perf_event__process_build_id,
+ .tracing_data = perf_event__process_tracing_data,
.ordered_events = true,
.ordering_requires_timestamps = true,
},
--
2.13.0.303.g4ebf302169-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists