[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170518093500.GA20808@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 11:35:00 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Ben Pineau <benjamin.pineau@...akl.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Two sched patchs missing from 4.4-stable: inclusion possible?
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 11:11:23AM +0200, Ben Pineau wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The following two patches series, merged in mainline 4.7, was Cc'ed to stable@,
> but somehow didn't made its way to the 4.4.x stable tree:
> 754bd598be9bbc953bc709a9e8ed7f3188bfb9d7
> 094f469172e00d6ab0a3130b0e01c83b3cf3a98d
>
> Links to the discussions:
> https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=146608185431676
> https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=146608184031673
>
> This patch series address a real life issue, ie. we're seeing an
> oopsing machine about every day on a kubernetes cluster, and
> other users reported the same problem, for instance :
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1687512
> https://github.com/kubernetes/kops/issues/874
>
> Those two patches are also on their way for inclusion in the current
> (4.4 based) LTS Ubuntu release :
> https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-kernel/ubuntu/+source/linux/+git/xenial/+ref/master-next
>
> Could this series be considered for 4.4-stable inclusion by any chance ?
>
> For ref, the stacktrace I'm getting on an unpatched 4.4.67 kernel:
>
> [168797.975683] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer
> dereference at 0000000000000050
> [168797.976656] Call Trace:
> [168797.976656] [<ffffffff810bbef5>] pick_next_task_fair+0x75/0x4b0
> [168797.976656] [<ffffffff816f38a1>] __schedule+0x6c1/0x7f0
> [168797.976656] [<ffffffff816f3a05>] schedule+0x35/0x80
> [168797.976656] [<ffffffff816f3cee>] schedule_preempt_disabled+0xe/0x10
> [168797.976656] [<ffffffff810c299a>] cpu_startup_entry+0x19a/0x360
> [168797.976656] [<ffffffff810512f0>] start_secondary+0x160/0x1a0
> [168797.976656] RIP [<ffffffff810b562f>] pick_next_entity+0x7f/0x160
Sure, I'll be glad to take them if I can get an ack from the patch
authors, and reviewers (added to: and cc:)...
Ingo and Peter, any objections?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists