[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VdsL_bT-HN3yHxNwQTMfJnfDc1EPEmn+ARZSvZDts7W6g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 13:23:33 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@...ethink.co.uk>,
Sascha Weisenberger <sascha.weisenberger@...mens.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] gpio: exar: Fix reading of directions and values
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 1:16 PM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com> wrote:
> On 2017-05-18 12:11, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 8:20 AM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com> wrote:
>> Full picture:
>>
>> val = exar_get(chip, addr) & BIT(offset % 8);
>>
>> return !!val;
>>
>> How it could be non-(1 or 0)?
>>
>
> Right - but what is the point of that other style?
gpio-exar.c is just 4th module which is using it, OTOH the rest of
GPIO drivers are using return !!val style.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists