[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170518104744.304949872@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 12:46:57 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Christoffer Dall <cdall@...aro.org>,
Levente Kurusa <lkurusa@...hat.com>,
Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.10 28/93] KVM: arm/arm64: fix races in kvm_psci_vcpu_on
4.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>
commit 6c7a5dce22b3f3cc44be098e2837fa6797edb8b8 upstream.
Fix potential races in kvm_psci_vcpu_on() by taking the kvm->lock
mutex. In general, it's a bad idea to allow more than one PSCI_CPU_ON
to process the same target VCPU at the same time. One such problem
that may arise is that one PSCI_CPU_ON could be resetting the target
vcpu, which fills the entire sys_regs array with a temporary value
including the MPIDR register, while another looks up the VCPU based
on the MPIDR value, resulting in no target VCPU found. Resolves both
races found with the kvm-unit-tests/arm/psci unit test.
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@...aro.org>
Reported-by: Levente Kurusa <lkurusa@...hat.com>
Suggested-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
arch/arm/kvm/psci.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/arch/arm/kvm/psci.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kvm/psci.c
@@ -208,9 +208,10 @@ int kvm_psci_version(struct kvm_vcpu *vc
static int kvm_psci_0_2_call(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
- int ret = 1;
+ struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
unsigned long psci_fn = vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, 0) & ~((u32) 0);
unsigned long val;
+ int ret = 1;
switch (psci_fn) {
case PSCI_0_2_FN_PSCI_VERSION:
@@ -230,7 +231,9 @@ static int kvm_psci_0_2_call(struct kvm_
break;
case PSCI_0_2_FN_CPU_ON:
case PSCI_0_2_FN64_CPU_ON:
+ mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
val = kvm_psci_vcpu_on(vcpu);
+ mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
break;
case PSCI_0_2_FN_AFFINITY_INFO:
case PSCI_0_2_FN64_AFFINITY_INFO:
@@ -279,6 +282,7 @@ static int kvm_psci_0_2_call(struct kvm_
static int kvm_psci_0_1_call(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
+ struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
unsigned long psci_fn = vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, 0) & ~((u32) 0);
unsigned long val;
@@ -288,7 +292,9 @@ static int kvm_psci_0_1_call(struct kvm_
val = PSCI_RET_SUCCESS;
break;
case KVM_PSCI_FN_CPU_ON:
+ mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
val = kvm_psci_vcpu_on(vcpu);
+ mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
break;
default:
val = PSCI_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists