linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 74/80] Bluetooth: hci_intel: add missing tty-device sanity check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170518104837.314536830@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Thu, 18 May 2017 12:48:56 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@...el.com>,
        Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
        Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 74/80] Bluetooth: hci_intel: add missing tty-device sanity check

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>

commit dcb9cfaa5ea9aa0ec08aeb92582ccfe3e4c719a9 upstream.

Make sure to check the tty-device pointer before looking up the sibling
platform device to avoid dereferencing a NULL-pointer when the tty is
one end of a Unix98 pty.

Fixes: 74cdad37cd24 ("Bluetooth: hci_intel: Add runtime PM support")
Fixes: 1ab1f239bf17 ("Bluetooth: hci_intel: Add support for platform driver")
Cc: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/bluetooth/hci_intel.c |   13 ++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_intel.c
+++ b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_intel.c
@@ -307,6 +307,9 @@ static int intel_set_power(struct hci_ua
 	struct list_head *p;
 	int err = -ENODEV;
 
+	if (!hu->tty->dev)
+		return err;
+
 	mutex_lock(&intel_device_list_lock);
 
 	list_for_each(p, &intel_device_list) {
@@ -379,6 +382,9 @@ static void intel_busy_work(struct work_
 	struct intel_data *intel = container_of(work, struct intel_data,
 						busy_work);
 
+	if (!intel->hu->tty->dev)
+		return;
+
 	/* Link is busy, delay the suspend */
 	mutex_lock(&intel_device_list_lock);
 	list_for_each(p, &intel_device_list) {
@@ -889,6 +895,8 @@ done:
 	list_for_each(p, &intel_device_list) {
 		struct intel_device *dev = list_entry(p, struct intel_device,
 						      list);
+		if (!hu->tty->dev)
+			break;
 		if (hu->tty->dev->parent == dev->pdev->dev.parent) {
 			if (device_may_wakeup(&dev->pdev->dev)) {
 				set_bit(STATE_LPM_ENABLED, &intel->flags);
@@ -1056,6 +1064,9 @@ static int intel_enqueue(struct hci_uart
 
 	BT_DBG("hu %p skb %p", hu, skb);
 
+	if (!hu->tty->dev)
+		goto out_enqueue;
+
 	/* Be sure our controller is resumed and potential LPM transaction
 	 * completed before enqueuing any packet.
 	 */
@@ -1072,7 +1083,7 @@ static int intel_enqueue(struct hci_uart
 		}
 	}
 	mutex_unlock(&intel_device_list_lock);
-
+out_enqueue:
 	skb_queue_tail(&intel->txq, skb);
 
 	return 0;