linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.11 106/114] libata: reject passthrough WRITE SAME requests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170518103620.727581878@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Thu, 18 May 2017 12:46:56 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.11 106/114] libata: reject passthrough WRITE SAME requests

4.11-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>

commit c6ade20f5e50e188d20b711a618b20dd1d50457e upstream.

The WRITE SAME to TRIM translation rewrites the DATA OUT buffer.  While
the SCSI code accomodates for this by passing a read-writable buffer
userspace applications don't cater for this behavior.  In fact it can
be used to rewrite e.g. a readonly file through mmap and should be
considered as a security fix.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c |    8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

--- a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
@@ -3462,6 +3462,14 @@ static unsigned int ata_scsi_write_same_
 	if (unlikely(!dev->dma_mode))
 		goto invalid_opcode;

+	/*
+	 * We only allow sending this command through the block layer,
+	 * as it modifies the DATA OUT buffer, which would corrupt user
+	 * memory for SG_IO commands.
+	 */
+	if (unlikely(blk_rq_is_passthrough(scmd->request)))
+		goto invalid_opcode;
+
 	if (unlikely(scmd->cmd_len < 16)) {
 		fp = 15;
 		goto invalid_fld;