linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] scsi: zero per-cmd driver data for each MQ I/O

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BN6PR03MB248142AAC3E0D9851D2A841DA0E40@BN6PR03MB2481.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Thu, 18 May 2017 13:29:19 +0000
From:   KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@...disk.com>
CC:     "jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>,
        "martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] scsi: zero per-cmd driver data for each MQ I/O



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christoph Hellwig [mailto:hch@...radead.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2017 11:55 PM
> To: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@...disk.com>
> Cc: jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com; linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org; Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>;
> martin.petersen@...cle.com; Stephen Hemminger
> <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>; KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: zero per-cmd driver data for each MQ I/O
> 
> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 11:05:18PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > Thank you for the feedback. I'm working on a patch series that merges the
> scsi-sq
> > and scsi-mq code paths for command initialization and that should fix the
> bug you
> > encountered.
> 
> While that sounds great (I tried it a while ago but gave up due to
> priorities) I think we should merge this patch as-is and backport it
> to stable for now and rebase your series on top of it.
Thanks Christoph.

K. Y