[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170518.101318.1804846322170851657.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 10:13:18 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: colin.king@...onical.com
Cc: pabeni@...hat.com, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, jmorris@...ei.org,
yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, kaber@...sh.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] udp: make function udp_skb_dtor_locked static
From: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 09:50:36 +0100
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>
> Function udp_skb_dtor_locked does not need to be in global scope
> so make it static to fix sparse warning:
>
> net/ipv4/udp.c: warning: symbol 'udp_skb_dtor_locked' was not
> declared. Should it be static?
>
> Fixes: 6dfb4367cd911d ("udp: keep the sk_receive_queue held when splicing")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Applied.
Please explcitily say "[PATCH net-next]" in your Subject line next time
so that it is clear what tree your patch is targetting.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists