[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <A5330653-F609-4CE7-BE15-AD80C671FAD2@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 08:41:45 +0800
From: "Yan, Zheng" <zyan@...hat.com>
To: Luis Henriques <lhenriques@...e.com>
Cc: Sage Weil <sage@...hat.com>, Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>,
ceph-devel <ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ceph: check i_nlink while converting a file handle to
dentry
> On 19 May 2017, at 00:48, Luis Henriques <lhenriques@...e.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 09:36:44PM +0800, Yan, Zheng wrote:
>>
>>> On 17 May 2017, at 19:21, Luis Henriques <lhenriques@...e.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Converting a file handle to a dentry can be done call after the inode
>>> unlink. This means that __fh_to_dentry() requires an extra check to
>>> verify the number of links is not 0.
>>>
>>> The issue can be easily reproduced using xfstest generic/426, which does
>>> something like:
>>>
>>> name_to_handle_at(&fh)
>>> echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
>>> unlink()
>>> open_by_handle_at(&fh)
>>>
>>> The call to open_by_handle_at() should fail, as the file doesn't exist
>>> anymore.
>>>
>>> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
>>> Link: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/19958
>>> Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <lhenriques@...e.com>
>>> ---
>>> fs/ceph/export.c | 4 ++++
>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/ceph/export.c b/fs/ceph/export.c
>>> index e8f11fa565c5..7df550c13d7f 100644
>>> --- a/fs/ceph/export.c
>>> +++ b/fs/ceph/export.c
>>> @@ -91,6 +91,10 @@ static struct dentry *__fh_to_dentry(struct super_block *sb, u64 ino)
>>> ceph_mdsc_put_request(req);
>>> if (!inode)
>>> return ERR_PTR(-ESTALE);
>>> + if (inode->i_nlink == 0) {
>>> + iput(inode);
>>> + return ERR_PTR(-ESTALE);
>>> + }
>>> }
>>
>> maybe we should do this check in MDS
>
> Thank you for your review. Are you suggesting to do this check *only* in
> the MDS? I guess that's probably a good thing to do too, but don't you
> think it's a good idea to keep it on the client side as well?
Applied. Thanks
Yan, Zheng
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Luís
Powered by blists - more mailing lists