linux-kernel - [PATCH 22/31] futex-requeue-pi.txt: standardize document format

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <d84d18fa0cd82f4d2e5a1fe9751ea97c22de8a23.1495156488.git.mchehab@s-opensource.com>
Date:   Thu, 18 May 2017 22:22:27 -0300
From:   Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com>
To:     Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
        Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
        Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...el.com>,
        linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>
Subject: [PATCH 22/31] futex-requeue-pi.txt: standardize document format

Each text file under Documentation follows a different
format. Some doesn't even have titles!

Change its representation to follow the adopted standard,
using ReST markups for it to be parseable by Sphinx:

- promote level for the document title;
- mark literal blocks.

Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com>
---
 Documentation/futex-requeue-pi.txt | 83 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/futex-requeue-pi.txt b/Documentation/futex-requeue-pi.txt
index 77b36f59d16b..14ab5787b9a7 100644
--- a/Documentation/futex-requeue-pi.txt
+++ b/Documentation/futex-requeue-pi.txt
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
+================
 Futex Requeue PI
-----------------
+================
 
 Requeueing of tasks from a non-PI futex to a PI futex requires
 special handling in order to ensure the underlying rt_mutex is never
@@ -20,28 +21,28 @@ implementation would wake the highest-priority waiter, and leave the
 rest to the natural wakeup inherent in unlocking the mutex
 associated with the condvar.
 
-Consider the simplified glibc calls:
+Consider the simplified glibc calls::
 
-/* caller must lock mutex */
-pthread_cond_wait(cond, mutex)
-{
-	lock(cond->__data.__lock);
-	unlock(mutex);
-	do {
-	   unlock(cond->__data.__lock);
-	   futex_wait(cond->__data.__futex);
-	   lock(cond->__data.__lock);
-	} while(...)
-	unlock(cond->__data.__lock);
-	lock(mutex);
-}
+	/* caller must lock mutex */
+	pthread_cond_wait(cond, mutex)
+	{
+		lock(cond->__data.__lock);
+		unlock(mutex);
+		do {
+		unlock(cond->__data.__lock);
+		futex_wait(cond->__data.__futex);
+		lock(cond->__data.__lock);
+		} while(...)
+		unlock(cond->__data.__lock);
+		lock(mutex);
+	}
 
-pthread_cond_broadcast(cond)
-{
-	lock(cond->__data.__lock);
-	unlock(cond->__data.__lock);
-	futex_requeue(cond->data.__futex, cond->mutex);
-}
+	pthread_cond_broadcast(cond)
+	{
+		lock(cond->__data.__lock);
+		unlock(cond->__data.__lock);
+		futex_requeue(cond->data.__futex, cond->mutex);
+	}
 
 Once pthread_cond_broadcast() requeues the tasks, the cond->mutex
 has waiters. Note that pthread_cond_wait() attempts to lock the
@@ -53,29 +54,29 @@ In order to support PI-aware pthread_condvar's, the kernel needs to
 be able to requeue tasks to PI futexes.  This support implies that
 upon a successful futex_wait system call, the caller would return to
 user space already holding the PI futex.  The glibc implementation
-would be modified as follows:
+would be modified as follows::
 
 
-/* caller must lock mutex */
-pthread_cond_wait_pi(cond, mutex)
-{
-	lock(cond->__data.__lock);
-	unlock(mutex);
-	do {
-	   unlock(cond->__data.__lock);
-	   futex_wait_requeue_pi(cond->__data.__futex);
-	   lock(cond->__data.__lock);
-	} while(...)
-	unlock(cond->__data.__lock);
-        /* the kernel acquired the mutex for us */
-}
+	/* caller must lock mutex */
+	pthread_cond_wait_pi(cond, mutex)
+	{
+		lock(cond->__data.__lock);
+		unlock(mutex);
+		do {
+		unlock(cond->__data.__lock);
+		futex_wait_requeue_pi(cond->__data.__futex);
+		lock(cond->__data.__lock);
+		} while(...)
+		unlock(cond->__data.__lock);
+		/* the kernel acquired the mutex for us */
+	}
 
-pthread_cond_broadcast_pi(cond)
-{
-	lock(cond->__data.__lock);
-	unlock(cond->__data.__lock);
-	futex_requeue_pi(cond->data.__futex, cond->mutex);
-}
+	pthread_cond_broadcast_pi(cond)
+	{
+		lock(cond->__data.__lock);
+		unlock(cond->__data.__lock);
+		futex_requeue_pi(cond->data.__futex, cond->mutex);
+	}
 
 The actual glibc implementation will likely test for PI and make the
 necessary changes inside the existing calls rather than creating new
-- 
2.9.4