[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170518.222753.1822313785663789393.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 22:27:53 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: babu.moger@...cle.com
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, arnd@...db.de,
shannon.nelson@...cle.com, haakon.bugge@...cle.com,
steven.sistare@...cle.com, vijay.ac.kumar@...cle.com,
jane.chu@...cle.com, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] kernel/locking: Fix compile error with qrwlock.c
From: Babu Moger <babu.moger@...cle.com>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 18:36:05 -0600
> Seeing this error on SPARC while compiling qrwlock.c.
>
> CC kernel/locking/qrwlock.o
> In file included from ./include/asm-generic/qrwlock_types.h:5,
> from ./arch/sparc/include/asm/qrwlock.h:4,
> from kernel/locking/qrwlock.c:24:
> ./arch/sparc/include/asm/spinlock_types.h:5:3: error:
> #error "please don't include this file directly"
>
> Re-arrange the includes in qrwlock_types.h and also include spinlock.h
> in qrwlock.c to fix it. This should also help other architectures when
> queued rwlock is enabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@...cle.com>
> Reviewed-by: HÃ¥kon Bugge <haakon.bugge@...cle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jane Chu <jane.chu@...cle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@...cle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Vijay Kumar <vijay.ac.kumar@...cle.com>
I think you can simply remove the:
#ifndef __LINUX_SPINLOCK_TYPES_H
# error "please don't include this file directly"
#endif
stanza from the sparc header file instead. Other architectures
don't use this guard.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists