[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170518.223220.105988940116687879.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 22:32:20 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: babu.moger@...cle.com
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, arnd@...db.de,
shannon.nelson@...cle.com, haakon.bugge@...cle.com,
steven.sistare@...cle.com, vijay.ac.kumar@...cle.com,
jane.chu@...cle.com, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] arch/sparc: Enable queued spinlock support for
SPARC
From: Babu Moger <babu.moger@...cle.com>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 18:36:10 -0600
> @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ config SPARC64
> select ARCH_SUPPORTS_ATOMIC_RMW
> select HAVE_NMI
> select ARCH_USE_QUEUED_RWLOCKS
> + select ARCH_USE_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS
>
> config ARCH_DEFCONFIG
> string
Like the queued spinlock enabling patch, if this will be on
all the time for SPARC64 then:
> diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/asm/spinlock_64.h b/arch/sparc/include/asm/spinlock_64.h
> index 562dbd8..e2044e3 100644
> --- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/spinlock_64.h
> +++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/spinlock_64.h
> @@ -11,6 +11,9 @@
> #include <asm/processor.h>
> #include <asm/barrier.h>
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS
> +#include <asm/qspinlock.h>
> +#else
This ifdef doesn't make any sense, by definition it will always be on.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists