[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87inkxwc9n.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 10:12:36 +0300
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Tom Psyborg <pozega.tomislav@...il.com>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@...glemail.com>,
Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>,
Mathias Kresin <dev@...sin.me>,
Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
Serge Vasilugin <vasilugin@...dex.ru>,
Roman Yeryomin <roman@...em.lv>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jes Sorensen <jes.sorensen@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] rt2x00: rt2x00: improve calling conventions for register accessors
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> writes:
> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 8:44 AM, Tom Psyborg <pozega.tomislav@...il.com> wrote:
>> warning: 'rt2800_bbp_read' used but never defined
>> static u8 rt2800_bbp_read(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev,
>> ^
>> /home/ubuntu/Music/openwrt/build_dir/target-mipsel_24kc_musl-1.1.16/linux-ramips_mt7620/compat-wireless-2016-05-12/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2800lib.h:262:13:
>> warning: 'rt2800_bbp_write' used but never defined
>> static void rt2800_bbp_write(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev,
>> ^
>> CC [M]
>> /home/ubuntu/Music/openwrt/build_dir/target-mipsel_24kc_musl-1.1.16/linux-ramips_mt7620/compat-wireless-2016-05-12/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2800pci.o
>> In file included from
>> /home/ubuntu/Music/openwrt/build_dir/target-mipsel_24kc_musl-1.1.16/linux-ramips_mt7620/compat-wireless-2016-05-12/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2800pci.c:43:0:
>> /home/ubuntu/Music/openwrt/build_dir/target-mipsel_24kc_musl-1.1.16/linux-ramips_mt7620/compat-wireless-2016-05-12/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2800lib.h:259:11:
>> warning: 'rt2800_bbp_read' declared 'static' but never defined
>> [-Wunused-function]
>> static u8 rt2800_bbp_read(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev,
>> ^
>
> On which base version did you apply my patches? There may be a conflict
> against patches that are in your tree but not yet in linux-next, as I don't see
> the warning and also see no reference to rt2800_bbp_read in rt2800lib.h
I did a test build with current wireless-drivers-next and I also don't
see any warnings.
--
Kalle Valo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists