[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170519071922.awmib4qphl6ac6mj@flea.home>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 09:19:22 +0200
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@...c.io>
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH v6 9/9] arm64: allwinner: a64: enable Wi-Fi
for Pine64
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 11:03:33AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> >The patch looks OK, but given the module is removable, I think it
> >should be
> >an overlay. The overlay would enable WiFi + Bluetooth, and all the
> >peripherals needed to connect them.
> >
> >That way, if the module is not installed, we avoid confusing the user
> >with
> >unused peripherals, and avoid having live voltage on an unoccupied
> >header.
>
> But as this header have specific usage, we will also confuse user
> if it's not enabled as its target usage.
Yet you would enable unused resources.
This was already pointed out here:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9670235/
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (802 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists