linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 08/29] rfkill.txt: standardize document format

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 19 May 2017 08:11:17 -0300
From:   Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com>
To:     Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc:     Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
        Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
        Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...el.com>,
        linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/29] rfkill.txt: standardize document format

Em Fri, 19 May 2017 12:15:01 +0200
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net> escreveu:

> On Thu, 2017-05-18 at 22:25 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > 
> > +.. CONTENTS
> >  
> > +  1. Introduction
> > +  2. Implementation details
> > +  3. Kernel API
> > +  4. Userspace support  
> 
> Why not let this be auto-generated?
> 
> .. contents::
>    :depth: 1
> 
> should work, no?

Yes, it should work. Actually, you would need to use :depth: 2 to
produce this output:


	Contents

	    . rfkill - RF kill switch support
	        . Introduction
	        . Implementation details
	        . Kernel API
	        . Userspace support

I opted to keep the contents as a comment just because, in the past, some
maintainers complained about TOC removal, arguing that it makes harder
for the ones that would be reading the file in ascii.

Thanks,
Mauro