[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170519113005.3f5kwzg4pgh7j6a5@pd.tnic>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 13:30:05 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Toshimitsu Kani <toshi.kani@....com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Larry Woodman <lwoodman@...hat.com>,
Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 32/32] x86/mm: Add support to make use of Secure
Memory Encryption
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 01:56:13PM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> On 4/18/2017 4:22 PM, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> > Add support to check if SME has been enabled and if memory encryption
> > should be activated (checking of command line option based on the
> > configuration of the default state). If memory encryption is to be
> > activated, then the encryption mask is set and the kernel is encrypted
> > "in place."
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S | 1 +
> > arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c | 83 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > 2 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
>
> ...
>
> >
> > -unsigned long __init sme_enable(void)
> > +unsigned long __init sme_enable(struct boot_params *bp)
> > {
> > + const char *cmdline_ptr, *cmdline_arg, *cmdline_on, *cmdline_off;
> > + unsigned int eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
> > + unsigned long me_mask;
> > + bool active_by_default;
> > + char buffer[16];
>
> So it turns out that when KASLR is enabled (CONFIG_RAMDOMIZE_BASE=y)
> the stack-protector support causes issues with this function because
What issues?
> it is called so early. I can get past it by adding:
>
> CFLAGS_mem_encrypt.o := $(nostackp)
>
> in the arch/x86/mm/Makefile, but that obviously eliminates the support
> for the whole file. Would it be better to split out the sme_enable()
> and other boot routines into a separate file or just apply the
> $(nostackp) to the whole file?
Josh might have a better idea here... CCed.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists