[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170519113237.GN658@rric.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 13:32:37 +0200
From: Robert Richter <robert.richter@...ium.com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc: will.deacon@....com, rjw@...ysocki.net,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
devel@...ica.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
gakula@...iumnetworks.com, linu.cherian@...ium.com,
lorenzo.pieralisi@....com, hanjun.guo@...aro.org,
john.garry@...wei.com, shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com,
gabriele.paoloni@...wei.com, Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] acpica: iort: Update SMMU models for IORT rev. C
On 12.05.17 11:41:41, Robin Murphy wrote:
> IORT revision C has been published with a number of new SMMU
> implementation identifiers; define them.
>
> CC: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>
> CC: Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>
> CC: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
As an additional note, could these both patches being marked stable?
If we are going to deploy fw with the new model number, older kernels
become unusable as the smmu is not detected any longer.
Thanks,
-Robert
Powered by blists - more mailing lists