linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] rt2x00: rt2x00: improve calling conventions for register accessors

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 19 May 2017 14:20:03 +0200
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     Tom Psyborg <pozega.tomislav@...il.com>
Cc:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
        linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
        Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@...glemail.com>,
        Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>,
        Mathias Kresin <dev@...sin.me>,
        Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
        Serge Vasilugin <vasilugin@...dex.ru>,
        Roman Yeryomin <roman@...em.lv>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jes Sorensen <jes.sorensen@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] rt2x00: rt2x00: improve calling conventions for
 register accessors

On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 2:15 PM, Tom Psyborg <pozega.tomislav@...il.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 19 May 2017 at 08:55, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On which base version did you apply my patches? There may be a conflict
>> against patches that are in your tree but not yet in linux-next, as I
>> don't see
>> the warning and also see no reference to rt2800_bbp_read in rt2800lib.h
>>
>>       Arnd
>
>
>
> it's not exactly base version, it is patched comapt-wireless in openwrt that
> i applied your patches to (i had to fix some things manually) but these
> warnings might appear because of recent mt7620 commit:
> https://git.lede-project.org/?p=lede/dangole/staging.git;a=blob_plain;f=package/kernel/mac80211/patches/999-0001-rt2800mmio-use-BBP-register-21-to-reset-MT7620-BBP.patch;hb=f4f0d8efa2d55ada111ddcd502a51041364bd7e5

I suspect you just did an incorrect merge, and left an extra 'static'
in front of the declaration in the header file when you modified the
function prototype.

      Arnd