lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VfmF-5kYdTiR0Jt3dyp-7OJDBZg_5LA3odf4M0jyiX+-w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 19 May 2017 16:15:01 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Chris Ruehl <chris.ruehl@...ys.com.hk>
Cc:     Jiada Wang <jiada_wang@...tor.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        leonard.crestez@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] spi: imx: fix issue when tx_buf or rx_buf is NULL

On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 3:45 PM, Chris Ruehl <chris.ruehl@...ys.com.hk> wrote:
> On Thursday, May 18, 2017 06:01 PM, jiada_wang@...tor.com wrote:

> But I think we missing something here. We return from a void function()
> so the error keeps hidden. The root cause is calling this functions with a
> NULL pointer. See if you can fix this by find the caller and check if the
> parameter hand over are valid.

AFAIU some SPI controllers can have half-duplex protocol, in which the
second buffer might be absent.


> Disclaimer: http://www.gtsys.com.hk/email/classified.html

Just wondering if it's okay to have this type of footer in open source
community's mailing lists.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ