[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VcvtXP06=VLyzA3CytxeLyBp9T_BQrb0NG87ES_31CVTQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 16:16:58 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andreas Noever <andreas.noever@...il.com>,
Michael Jamet <michael.jamet@...el.com>,
Yehezkel Bernat <yehezkel.bernat@...el.com>,
Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>,
Amir Levy <amir.jer.levy@...el.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Mario Limonciello <Mario.Limonciello@...l.com>,
Jared.Dominguez@...l.com,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/24] thunderbolt: Introduce thunderbolt bus and
connection manager
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Mika Westerberg
<mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 07:43:13PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 5:38 PM, Mika Westerberg
>> <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>> One nit below.
>>
>> > +static void tb_domain_release(struct device *dev)
>> > +{
>> > + struct tb *tb = container_of(dev, struct tb, dev);
>> > +
>> > + if (tb->ctl)
>> > + tb_ctl_free(tb->ctl);
>>
>> The usual pattern is to put such checks inside *_free() type of functions.
>
> tb_ctl_free() and these patterns are from the original code. I just
> moved the calls from tb.c intto here. No problem doing that change but I
> suppose that should be done first in a separate patch before this patch.
Precisely!
>> > +
>> > + destroy_workqueue(tb->wq);
>> > + ida_simple_remove(&tb_domain_ida, tb->index);
>> > + kfree(tb);
>> > +}
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists