[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHC9VhSFrXLE349atrmFDYjCWuda_O4TtJgEUwnK-DDZUx00bw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 11:09:18 -0400
From: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
Cc: Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>,
James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>,
"Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>, selinux@...ho.nsa.gov,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selinux: Mark array 'labeling_behaviors' as __maybe_unused
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 3:07 PM, Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org> wrote:
> The array is only referenced in an ARRAY_SIZE() statement. Adding the
> attribute fixes the following warning when building with clang:
>
> security/selinux/hooks.c:338:20: error: variable 'labeling_behaviors'
> is not needed and will not be emitted
> [-Werror,-Wunneeded-internal-declaration]
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
> ---
> security/selinux/hooks.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
The fact that we only reference labeling_behaviors in one spot, and
even then we only use it as a parameter to ARRAY_SIZE(), makes me
believe we may be able to get rid of labeling_behaviors and use
SECURITY_FS_USE_MAX in its place.
Anyone working on any patches which make use of labeling_behaviors?
> diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c
> index e67a526d1f30..450ff9f3161c 100644
> --- a/security/selinux/hooks.c
> +++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c
> @@ -400,7 +400,7 @@ static void superblock_free_security(struct super_block *sb)
>
> /* The file system's label must be initialized prior to use. */
>
> -static const char *labeling_behaviors[7] = {
> +static const char * __maybe_unused labeling_behaviors[7] = {
> "uses xattr",
> "uses transition SIDs",
> "uses task SIDs",
> --
> 2.13.0.303.g4ebf302169-goog
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists