| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20170519162716.GA684@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 11:27:16 -0500
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, leif.lindholm@...aro.org,
lorenzo.pieralisi@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] efifb: Avoid reconfiguration of BAR that covers the
framebuffer
[+cc linux-pci]
On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 04:27:44PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On UEFI systems, the PCI subsystem is enumerated by the firmware,
> and if a graphical framebuffer is exposed by a PCI device, its base
> address and size are exposed to the OS via the Graphics Output
> Protocol (GOP).
>
> On arm64 PCI systems, the entire PCI hierarchy is reconfigured from
> scratch at boot. This may result in the GOP framebuffer address to
> become stale, if the BAR covering the framebuffer is modified. This
> will cause the framebuffer to become unresponsive, and may in some
> cases result in unpredictable behavior if the range is reassigned to
> another device.
>
> So add a non-x86 quirk to the EFI fb driver to find the BAR associated
> with the GOP base address, and claim the BAR resource so that the PCI
> core will not move it.
I know this has already been merged as 55d728a40d36 ("efi/fb: Avoid
reconfiguration of BAR that covers the framebuffer"), and I'm not
suggesting that we revert it, but I have some misgivings.
One is the "#ifndef CONFIG_X86". In principle, there is nothing arch-
specific here. I don't think it's a good idea to build in dependencies on
things like "this arch preserves (or reprograms) PCI BARs". The PCI core
may reprogram all, some, or none of the PCI BARs, depending on what (if
anything) firmware has done.
Another is the use of pci_claim_resource() to express the idea that "this
BAR can not be moved". We have IORESOURCE_PCI_FIXED for that purpose, and
previous versions of the patch used that. I understand there was some
problem with that, but I wish we could figure out and fix that problem
instead of using a different mechanism.
I'm not even completely sold on the idea that we need to prevent the BAR
from being moved. I'm not a UEFI expert, but if this requirement is in the
spec, we should reference it. If not, it should be sufficient to remember
the boot-time BAR value, match the GOP base to *that*, and map it to
whatever the current BAR value is.
> Fixes: 9822504c1fa5 ("efifb: Enable the efi-framebuffer platform driver ...")
> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # v4.7+
> Cc: Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>
> Cc: Peter Jones <pjones@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/video/fbdev/efifb.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/efifb.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/efifb.c
> index 8c4dc1e1f94f..758960b6aec9 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/efifb.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/efifb.c
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
> #include <linux/efi.h>
> #include <linux/errno.h>
> #include <linux/fb.h>
> +#include <linux/pci.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <linux/screen_info.h>
> #include <video/vga.h>
> @@ -143,6 +144,8 @@ static struct attribute *efifb_attrs[] = {
> };
> ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS(efifb);
>
> +static bool pci_dev_disabled; /* FB base matches BAR of a disabled device */
> +
> static int efifb_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
> {
> struct fb_info *info;
> @@ -152,7 +155,7 @@ static int efifb_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
> unsigned int size_total;
> char *option = NULL;
>
> - if (screen_info.orig_video_isVGA != VIDEO_TYPE_EFI)
> + if (screen_info.orig_video_isVGA != VIDEO_TYPE_EFI || pci_dev_disabled)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> if (fb_get_options("efifb", &option))
> @@ -360,3 +363,64 @@ static struct platform_driver efifb_driver = {
> };
>
> builtin_platform_driver(efifb_driver);
> +
> +#ifndef CONFIG_X86
> +
> +static bool pci_bar_found; /* did we find a BAR matching the efifb base? */
> +
> +static void claim_efifb_bar(struct pci_dev *dev, int idx)
> +{
> + u16 word;
> +
> + pci_bar_found = true;
> +
> + pci_read_config_word(dev, PCI_COMMAND, &word);
> + if (!(word & PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY)) {
> + pci_dev_disabled = true;
> + dev_err(&dev->dev,
> + "BAR %d: assigned to efifb but device is disabled!\n",
> + idx);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + if (pci_claim_resource(dev, idx)) {
> + pci_dev_disabled = true;
> + dev_err(&dev->dev,
> + "BAR %d: failed to claim resource for efifb!\n", idx);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + dev_info(&dev->dev, "BAR %d: assigned to efifb\n", idx);
> +}
> +
> +static void efifb_fixup_resources(struct pci_dev *dev)
> +{
> + u64 base = screen_info.lfb_base;
> + u64 size = screen_info.lfb_size;
> + int i;
> +
> + if (pci_bar_found || screen_info.orig_video_isVGA != VIDEO_TYPE_EFI)
> + return;
> +
> + if (screen_info.capabilities & VIDEO_CAPABILITY_64BIT_BASE)
> + base |= (u64)screen_info.ext_lfb_base << 32;
> +
> + if (!base)
> + return;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < PCI_STD_RESOURCE_END; i++) {
> + struct resource *res = &dev->resource[i];
> +
> + if (!(res->flags & IORESOURCE_MEM))
> + continue;
> +
> + if (res->start <= base && res->end >= base + size - 1) {
> + claim_efifb_bar(dev, i);
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_CLASS_HEADER(PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_BASE_CLASS_DISPLAY,
> + 16, efifb_fixup_resources);
> +
> +#endif
> --
> 2.9.3
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists