linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 01/11] dt-bindings: update the binding for Allwinner H3 TVE support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170519180215.7lc7duueu74pt4kz@flea.home>
Date:   Fri, 19 May 2017 20:02:15 +0200
From:   Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To:     Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@...c.io>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 01/11] dt-bindings: update the binding for Allwinner
 H3 TVE support

On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 12:43:44AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> -On SoCs other than the A33 and V3s, there is one more clock required:
> +For the following compatibles:
> +   * allwinner,sun5i-a13-tcon
> +   * allwinner,sun6i-a31-tcon
> +   * allwinner,sun6i-a31s-tcon
> +   * allwinner,sun8i-a33-tcon
> +   * allwinner,sun8i-v3s-tcon
> +there is one more clock and one more property required:
> + - clocks:
> +   - 'tcon-ch0': The clock driving the TCON channel 0
> + - clock-output-names: Name of the pixel clock created
> +
> +For the following compatibles:
> +   * allwinner,sun5i-a13-tcon
> +   * allwinner,sun6i-a31-tcon
> +   * allwinner,sun6i-a31s-tcon
> +   * allwinner,sun8i-h3-tcon0
> +there is one more clock required:
>     - 'tcon-ch1': The clock driving the TCON channel 1

Putting ID's in the compatible name is usually a bad idea. What is the
difference between the two? Only that the second one doesn't have a
clock?

That seems highly unlikely. How does it generate the pixel clock
frequency?

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (802 bytes)