[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170519.153509.2070245733064513776.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 15:35:09 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: peterz@...radead.org
Cc: babu.moger@...cle.com, mingo@...hat.com, arnd@...db.de,
shannon.nelson@...cle.com, haakon.bugge@...cle.com,
steven.sistare@...cle.com, vijay.ac.kumar@...cle.com,
jane.chu@...cle.com, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] arch/sparc: Enable queued rwlocks for SPARC
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 21:31:26 +0200
> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 03:15:53PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
>> However, I don't see what any of this has to do with the feedback
>> I was giving the patch author :-)
>
> Uhm,... I think my morning brain read things like you having doubts
> about making it sparc64 only. But I could have easily misread things.
> Ignore my ramblings :-)
He was editing a sparc64-specific header, adding "queued locks" ifdefs,
which makes no sense if for SPARC64 the queued locks will always be
enabled.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists