[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170519172801.042a238e@vela.lan>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 17:28:01 -0300
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...el.com>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/29] printk-formats.txt: standardize document format
Em Fri, 19 May 2017 03:26:08 -0700
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> escreveu:
> On Thu, 2017-05-18 at 22:25 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > Each text file under Documentation follows a different
> > format. Some doesn't even have titles!
> >
> > Change its representation to follow the adopted standard,
> > using ReST markups for it to be parseable by Sphinx:
> >
> > - add a title for the document;
> > - add markups for section titles;
> > - move authorship to the beginning and use :Author:;
> > - use right markup for tables;
> > - mark literals and literal blocks.
>
> I think the .rst markup is far uglier to read as text
> and harder to modify for new additions to %p<foo>
> given column alignments.
>
> For instance below, but other than that, the .rst
> is easier to read.
>
> > diff --git a/Documentation/printk-formats.txt b/Documentation/printk-formats.txt
> []
> > @@ -1,139 +1,180 @@
> > -If variable is of Type, use printk format specifier:
> > ----------------------------------------------------------
> > - int %d or %x
> > - unsigned int %u or %x
> > - long %ld or %lx
> > - unsigned long %lu or %lx
> > - long long %lld or %llx
> > - unsigned long long %llu or %llx
> > - size_t %zu or %zx
> > - ssize_t %zd or %zx
> > - s32 %d or %x
> > - u32 %u or %x
> > - s64 %lld or %llx
> > - u64 %llu or %llx
> []
> > +======================= ===========================
> > +If variable is of Type use printk format specifier
> > +======================= ===========================
> > +``int`` ``%d or %x``
> > +``unsigned int`` ``%u or %x``
> > +``long`` ``%ld or %lx``
> > +``unsigned long`` ``%lu or %lx``
> > +``long long`` ``%lld or %llx``
> > +``unsigned long long`` ``%llu or %llx``
> > +``size_t`` ``%zu or %zx``
> > +``ssize_t`` ``%zd or %zx``
> > +``s32`` ``%d or %x``
> > +``u32`` ``%u or %x``
> > +``s64`` ``%lld or %llx``
> > +``u64`` ``%llu or %llx``
> > +======================= ===========================
Well, we could,instead, use literal blocks, e. g. something like:
::
-If variable is of Type, use printk format specifier:
----------------------------------------------------------
- int %d or %x
- unsigned int %u or %x
- long %ld or %lx
- unsigned long %lu or %lx
- long long %lld or %llx
- unsigned long long %llu or %llx
- size_t %zu or %zx
- ssize_t %zd or %zx
- s32 %d or %x
- u32 %u or %x
- s64 %lld or %llx
- u64 %llu or %llx
Cheers,
Mauro
Powered by blists - more mailing lists