[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170520165345.GA26850@lst.de>
Date: Sat, 20 May 2017 18:53:45 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] Failed network caused by: xhci: switch to
pci_alloc_irq_vectors
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 09:49:56AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Side note: why is it doing that " > 1" check, when any value _other_
> than 1 is wrong?
It's the same effect, so either one is fine with me.
> Also, to match the non-MSI implementation, wouldn't it be nicer to
> just write it that same way (and also verify "dev->irq"):
>
> if (flags & PCI_IRQ_LEGACY) {
> if (min_vecs == 1 && dev->irq)
> return 1;
> }
> return -ENOSPC;
>
> (the exact error value probably doesn't matter in practice, but the
> CONFIG_MSI case returns ENOSPC by default and that's what
> Documentation/PCI/MSI-HOWTO.txt says too).
Sure. Just sent the previous version to Bjorn so that he could maybe
make it for -rc2, but I'll respin it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists